Consent for the use of cookies and other tools

Tools and cookies used on the website collect information about visitors in anonymized form. Your consents enable us to ensure the functioning of all website features, customize certain content specifically for you, and continuously improve the website by analyzing visits.

Types of Cookies

I consent to the website use of tools, including cookies, which ensure full functionality and an appropriate level of security. I understand that without this, the website cannot offer proper functioning, such as website navigation, customization of appearance, and access to specific parts of the website.

I consent to the website use of tools, including cookies, which collect anonymized data about website visitors. I understand that without this, website administrators cannot analyze site traffic and usage patterns to improve the user experience on the website.

Changes were successfully saved

About the self-evaluation of study programmes at the UL

With the aim of monitoring and improving the quality of study programmes, regular self-evaluation is carried out for each active study programme, as defined in Article 6 of the Quality System Rules of the University of Ljubljana (UL). Self-evaluation of study programmes serves to ensure the quality of programme provision, and to monitor the current relevance and sustainability of the individual study programme.

Self-evaluation of study programmes is the basis for overhauling and modifying programmes, and represents a crucial mechanism for developing study programmes and the process of study at member faculties. Self-evaluation of study programmes is performed annually, and the conclusions of this process are incorporated into the Business Report and Quality Assurance Report of the member faculties and the UL.

The method of performing self-evaluation of study programmes is defined in detail by the UL Guidelines for self-evaluation of study programmes.

Analyses

In order to monitor the implementation of the self-evaluation of study programmes and to update the quality system, we periodically prepare a meta-analysis of self-evaluation reports of study programmes. As part of the meta-analysis, we check the operation of the self-evaluation mechanism by individual dimensions and check the quality of the self-evaluation and, above all, the presence of evaluation, which is of fundamental importance for the appropriate updating of study programmes.